|
I don't get why people don't like 504s.
It seems that people don't like what they don't understand.
504s serve a broader section of people with disabilities.
IEPs are absolutely inappropriate for people with an impairment, but can still achieve an educational benefit with modification regular education.
There are TWO requirements to be eligible for special education.
1 - Is to have a disability.
2 - Is to need specialized supports and services because you cannot achieve a measurable educational benefit from a modification of regular education (people kind of forget this part).
Whereas, folks who can get a measurable ed benefit, but still have a level of impairment would benefit greatly from a 504.
http://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/504faq.html
They also carry stronger weight into higher education.
Yes, there a abuses in both special education and 504s, but anyone who claims that 504 have no place, that they are unenforceable, or treat them as a "consolation prize" for special education are only showing their lack of understanding on them.
I see this mindset from the same people that try to paint proponents of Least Restrictive Environment as those that just want to deny parents services.
Or those that think "more is better" in terms of services, goals, etc.
I find it ironic that the research on ADHD and business productivity reveal that focus and prioritization are more important than trying to multi-task, but then insist on IEPs that have dozens of goals and services with no focus or prioritization.
Can people tell stories of districts that abuse parents, deny necessary services, use 504 incorrectly, etc?
Yes, you can.
Yes, I have seen it too.
However, that doesn't mean that one mentality towards service of disabilities should overshadow individualization, research, reason, attempts to provide as normal an experience as reasonable , avoiding over-pathologizing a problem, and developing the skills necessary for a competitive workplace.
http://askdreric-schoolpsychologist.blogspot.com/
Quote
|