|
Different way to frame the question...
Let's take a different perspective.
#1 - Do you need a label for it? First, how much does functioning appear to be impaired? You don't necessarily need a label to try something like a social skills class. How much improvement do interventions create?
#2 - So many things can look like ADHD, you really do not want to ask, "Does this look like ADHD?" If you are asking, it probably does look like ADHD, but looking like it does not mean it is. Anxiety, diabetes, hyperthyroid, and Asperger's are a few things that look like ADHD, but are not.
ADHD is a diagnosis of exclusion.
We do not ask if is ADHD.
We line up every other alternative explanation, then we see if we can reasonably knock each alternative explanation down.
When every other explanation is considered and disproved, then, and only then, can we consider ADHD.
It may not be as quick of an answer, but I would rather do it right than do it over.
Sometimes, a misdiagnosis is just an issue of semantics.
Other times, it may mean we are missing a more serious diagnosis.
Quote
Last edited by eabeam : 5 Feb 2010 @ 9:39 PM.
Reason: misspelled word.
|