|
"Reform" Mathmatics vs. Old-School Arithmetic
Just out of curiousity...has anyone else here noticed problems with their AD/HD students and reform mathmatics curriculums?
Here's a quick bit on what Reform Math is:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reform_math
I'm asking this because I graduated from high school in 2007 and experienced both styles of math instruction. The school district I went to used Addison-Wesley Mathmatics until I started 4th grade; then they swtiched to Everyday Mathmatics and eventually the Core-Plus version:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Core-Plus_Mathematics_Project
My grades in math were pretty reasonable until we switched to the Everyday Math curriculum; then they PLUMMETTED! Seriously, I went from an A- at the end of 3rd grade to an F within a month of starting 4th grade. It felt as if we jumped up a grade level and I couldn't keep up; we studied several different concepts at once, with very little practice time or homework, and I clearly remember being penalized for not "showing my work" and for not solving the problem exactly how the textbook told us to, regardless of whether or not I got the answer correct.
Under the old system, we studied one concept at a time, with at least a few pages of homework every night that basically consisted of practicing the same basic type of problem over and over until we were confident enough to do that type of problem in our heads. I think I had an average of three pages of math homework in third grade, with 10-20 problems on each page, some of which were repeated in various ways. Since we were judged on whether or not we arrived at the correct answer, we had the freedom to adapt our own ways of solving the problem. The only time I was ever required to show my work to the teacher was when I kept getting the same problem wrong several times in a row, and that was just so the teacher could figure out where I miscalculated.
I was just wondering if anyone else here had similar trouble with reform math?
Quote
|