|
Sure, why not?
Author Thom Hartman proposes we reconsider ADHD. Instead of a disease, it could be an adaptation from hunter-gatherer days (he even mentions Edison). http://www.amazon.com/Edison-Gene-ADHD-Hunter-Child/dp/0892811285
I like your theory and find it plausible. I would include more than ADHD minds, though. A variety of mental and physical conditions have contributed many things to science, art, and design. I'd venture a variety of artistic and scientific people such as depressed artists, monks with OCD, or programmers with Asperger's all have made a variety of significant contributions to culture. I'm sure a different mental or physical perspective allows people some freedom from the status quo as you suggest.
I'd be careful about treating cultural advances and technological leaps as if we're moving ahead in years, though. We definitely find better ways of doing things, but since we can't predict the future, we can't say "we've advance 10 years in so-and-so technology." And looking back doesn't count because hindsight has perfect vision. We've advanced compared to whom?
Just as evolution isn't "trying" to produce humans as its pinnacle of success, innovation doesn't have a destination either.
See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Punctuated_equilibrium for a parallel of what you're suggesting, but regarding evolution. There is no "destination" in culture or evolution (or the evolution of culture), but there are fast drastic changes.
Also check out http://www.ted.com/ for current-day innovators from a variety of backgrounds. You'll find high-energy, inspiring people that don't accept the status quo. Do you see ADHD symptoms in the presenters?
Quote
|