Special-Ed Ruling Upheld

The Supreme Court upheld a ruling that the New York City school system must pay private school tuition for disabled children, even if the parents refuse to try public school programs first.

Thursday November 15th - 1:15pm

On October 10, a 4-4 Supreme Court split upheld a ruling that the New York City school system must reimburse parents of a child with special needs such as attention deficit disorder (ADD ADHD) for tuition at a private school, even if the child has not first attended a public school. Under the Individuals with Disabilities in Education Act (IDEA) of 1975, schools are required to provide a “free appropriate public education.” Parents are allowed to seek reimbursement for a private education if they show that the public school’s services cannot meet their child’s needs.

In 1997, the plaintiff, Tom Freston, rejected a special-education plan proposed by the New York City school system for his then-eight-year-old son, who has ADHD and learning disabilities. Freston won a 2006 case, arguing that his son should not have to “try out” a public program that he felt was clearly inadequate. Because the Supreme Court upheld the 2006 decision, with a split (Justice Anthony Kennedy recused himself from the case), the case will not set a legal precedent outside of the circuit, which includes New York, Connecticut, and Vermont.

“This is certainly a victory for this family. For the disability community as a whole, it’s not as solid a victory as we had hoped for, but it’s a limited step in the right direction,” notes disabilities advocate and attorney Robert Tudisco. What good may come from litigation like this, which does not set a legal precedent? Tudisco hopes it will “encourage more schools to design IEPs in the context of a child’s needs, rather than piece together a program based on the services they already have available.”

Freston, a former Viacom executive, brought the case on principle, and he has donated the approximately $21,000 per year tuition reimbursement to the New York City public school system. In a statement, Freston said that he wanted to “ensure that our government, as a matter of public policy, fulfills its obligations to families by ensuring they have access to suitable special-education programs.”

-as reported in the December/January 2008 issue

Copyright © 1998 - 2013 New Hope Media LLC. All rights reserved. Your use of this site is governed by our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
ADDitude does not provide medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. The material on this web site is provided for educational purposes only. See additional information.
New Hope Media, 39 W. 37th Street, 15th Floor, New York, NY 10018